Contacted by Checon? Verify it’s us →
Case study · Services and customer care

Does your service standard work when no one is watching?

Segment
Public-facing service network
Topic
Customer experience and service standards
Method
More than 100 mystery shopping evaluations, in person and through digital channels
Evaluator Mystery shopper

100+ evaluations
in person and digital

The starting point

An organization with a broad regional footprint served the public through a network of service locations. Its commitment was to deliver the same quality, whatever the location or channel.

Every stage of contact had a defined standard. On paper, the model was ready.

What nobody knew yet was what happened when an ordinary person showed up to be served.

On paper
  • Welcome
  • Explore the need
  • Advise
  • Wrap up

Observe, don’t ask

Ask staff how service should work, and you find out what they know. Not what they do.

That’s why the project used mystery shopping. Across more than 100 evaluations, trained shoppers approached the service locations like ordinary customers and recorded how they were welcomed, advised and referred.

From first contact to goodbye

The evaluation followed every stage of service:

No.Moment and what is observed
1The welcome: courtesy, attention and the demeanor of whoever greets the customer.
2Understanding: did staff try to find out what the person needed before giving advice?
3The solution: were the alternatives clear, and was there a defined path forward?
4The goodbye: did the interaction end with a recap and a way to stay in touch?the most overlooked

Courtesy is only the first of these moments. Friendly service that doesn’t understand the customer, or that ends with no next step, looks right but falls short. The goodbye, in particular, tends to be the most overlooked moment, and it’s the one that decides whether a person comes back.

Service starts before the door

Before reaching a location, people look for information online, call, send a message or find the organization on social media. So the evaluation covered those channels too, including response times and how current the published information was.

Even the physical space was evaluated. Finding the right address, recognizing the brand and arriving at a well-kept space are all part of the experience. To a customer, everything sends a message.

  1. Online search
  2. Phone calls
  3. Messaging
  4. Social media
  5. Response time
  6. Published information
  7. Environment
  8. Door

A problem at one location, or a problem with the standard?

Each visit produced its own evaluation. The real value, though, came from looking at them all together.

The evaluations were consolidated to compare stages of service, regions and types of service center. Unmet criteria were mapped to show where failures kept recurring.

That view makes a crucial distinction. A failure at one location is that location’s problem. The same failure at many locations points to a problem with the standard itself, or with how it was taught.

P1P2P3P4P5P6P7P8
Item 1✕
Item 2
Item 3✕✕✕✕✕✕
Item 4
Failure at one location: a problem for that locationSame failure at many locations: a problem with the standardIllustrative

What changed for the customer

Separating one-off failures from network-wide ones led to three lines of action:

  • NetworkRevising the service standard wherever failures recurred across the network.
  • TrainingChanging the training, so the revised standard actually reached frontline staff.
  • LocationTargeted action at specific service centers where problems were local.
What we took from this project

Writing a service standard is the easy part. To find out whether it reaches the customer, sometimes you have to show up like any other customer and knock on the door.

Contact

Let’s design your next study

Tell us what decision you need to make. A specialist will get back to you within 1 business day with an initial approach.

Chat with us on WhatsApp